I Got The Shock News Of The Loss Of A Dear Friend-Jonathan S. Bowers

In early 1973 I was a struggling young graduate student working on an MBA at George Washington University. I was just out of the US Navy. I was living on VA checks and welfare as work was very scarce. I had some good luck. A nice loan officer at the Central National Bank of Maryland gave me a $5,000 student loan. I got a confirmation that funds were deposited to my account at that bank. I deposited $5,000 from that account to my account at the First National Bank of Washington. I paid for all of educational expenses including books,etc. I began to study in earnest. One day my fiorst wife got a call from the First National Bank of Washington. She was informed that our checking account was $5,000 overdrawn. I soon found out that my check drawn on the Central National Bank of Maryland had bounced. I called my bank manager out in Maryland. He told me that he had decided to cancel the loan. Unfortunately he had never informed me of this, I knew that I was in big problems. I knew that I needed a lawyer and that I was broke.
I looked around and found a start up law firm that was taking indigent clients. The firm was Bowers and Bluestein. I went to their very modest offices. I was introduced to Jonathan S, Bowers. He was 29 years of age at the time. He had recently graduated from George Washington University Law School.
Jon struck me as a competent and sincere person. He looked at my case. He called the First National Bank of Washington and set a meeting.
Jon and I went to the meeting together. He carried a copy of the District of Colombia criminal code with him. We were shown into a conference room where three officials from the bank were seated. Jon gave a good presentation. He pointed out that I had received the loan in good faith and that funds had been deposited to my account. I had made the deposit to my account at the First National Bank of Washington in good faith. I had only drawn funds after the bank had taken a hold off the check. Jon went on to point out that all checks from the Washington,DC area were cleared through the Federal Reserve Bank in Richmond, Virginia. Therefore the First National Bank of Washington had been negligent in releasing the hold on the check before it had cleared.
A bank security official threatened to charge me with writing a worthless check under the District of Columbia criminal code. Jon showed them the statute and the requirement that one knew the check was without sufficient funds before a criminal prosecution could succeed. I was then threatened with a lawsuit. Jon pointed out that such a suit would require the bank to list the Central National Bank of Maryland as a co-defendant. The bankers went silent. Jon explained to me later that one bank does not sue another bank. One of the bank managers told me that I was a man of incredible resourcefulness. The overdraft was removed form my account and I got to keep it.
Jon became both a lawyer and a god friend. He helped me in a later crisis. I last saw he and his first wife Dottie Di Santo in 1979. He had become a successful real estate developer. Here is his obituary:

Jon Bowers, 61; Created 9:30 Club

Network News
View More Activity
Resize Print
E-mail Reprints

By Joe Holley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 3, 2006
Jon Bowers, 61, an attorney and real estate developer with an abiding affection for the arts, died Oct. 6 of transitional cell carcinoma at his home in the District.

In 1979, Mr. Bowers purchased the eight-story Atlantic Building at 930 F Street NW, bought out the lease of a failing punk club on the first floor called Atlantis and replaced it with his club, managed by his first wife, Dodie DiSanto. They called it the 9:30 Club, a play on the F Street address and the nightly opening time.

Small, hip and lively, the club soon became the District’s “alternative” mecca — alternative being punk, new wave, funk, reggae, roots rock, go-go and any other musical genre that more established club and concert bookers were reluctant to embrace.

At a time when music lovers were reluctant to venture downtown, a lingering consequence of the 1968 riots, Mr. Bowers and his 9:30 Club were in the forefront as low rents and cheap real estate gradually attracted new galleries, restaurants and clubs, and people began coming back.


As The Washington Post noted in 1995, “thousands of bands have passed through the 9:30’s back door, many of them impressed that their equipment was loaded in from the same alley John Wilkes Booth escaped through after assassinating Abraham Lincoln at nearby Ford’s Theatre.”

Many of the bands — R.E.M. and the Red Hot Chili Peppers, for example — went on to bigger and better venues, but the 9:30 dared to book them early. DiSanto told the City Paper in 1995 that the 9:30 Club survived because of “the incredible benevolence of Jon Bowers, who financed the whole thing.”

“Without Jon Bowers, there would not have been a 9:30 Club,” said Seth Hurwitz, who bought the club in 1986. “He was a true patron of the arts.”

Mr. Bowers also wooed artists, photographers, architects and nonprofit organizations to the Atlantic Building. Tenants included Goldleaf Studios, the Blade, the D.C. Historic Preservation League and a number of photographers and artists.

Another client was District Curators, a nonprofit arts and entertainment organization founded in 1980 to promote vanguard jazz, new music and performance art. District Curators — with Mr. Bowers as hands-on chairman, financial benefactor and tireless fundraiser — brought to Washington such avant-garde artists as Philip Glass, controversial composer of minimalist operas, film and dance scores; Laurie Anderson, the violin-playing performance artist; and Sankai Juku, the Japanese butoh group that hangs from wires and tall buildings.

“I think there’s a younger generation, the generation I’m a part of, that’s grown up and is somewhat more open” to more experimental artists, Mr. Bowers told The Post in 1988.

Jonathan Stickney Bowers was born in Harrisburg, Pa., and grew up in Birmingham, Mich. He graduated from the University of Michigan in 1967 and received a law degree from George Washington University in 1971.

That year, he opened a law firm with his friend Herman Bluestein before returning to Michigan in 1975 to negotiate the sale of family interests on the death of his father. When he returned to Washington the next year, he began investing in real estate in the Mount Pleasant, Shaw and Columbia Heights neighborhoods. In 1977, he and two partners founded the brokerage firm of Intown Properties; he served as president and managing partner. He continued investing in District properties over the years, including buildings along the 14th Street corridor.

In 1996, he took what he called the first “safe job” of his entrepreneurial career, as principal and director of recruiting at Arthur Andersen, until that company’s demise in 2002. More recently, he was director of client development at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, working in the District, Virginia and New York offices.

His wife, the artist Lynn Flanagan Bowers, recalled that he traced his interest in music to his Detroit roots. “He was still listening to the newest independent music, sharing it with his children and recommending it to friends,” she said.

His marriage to DiSanto ended in divorce.

Survivors include his wife of 20 years, of the District; two daughters from his second marriage, Margaret Bowers and Elizabeth Bowers, and a stepson, Thomas Flanagan, all of the District; and a brother and sister.

More in the Obituary Section

Post Mortem
Post Mortem
The art of obituary writing, the culture of death, and more about the end of the story.
About this New Blog
From the Archives
From the Archives
Read Washington Post obituaries and view multimedia tributes to Pope John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, James Brown and more.
Effi Barry, 1944 – 2007
Gerald R. Ford, 1913 – 2006
[Campaign Finance]
A Local Life
This weekly feature takes a more personal look at extraordinary people in the D.C. area.
A Local Life: John Hoke, 85, never ran out of inventive ideas
© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Network News
Friends’ Activity
View More Activity

I was relieved to have won the cas

My Son Found Some Fascinating New Information On The Israelis And The Kenndy Assasination

I read this off a website http://www.infowars.com/netanyahu-promises-iran-will-not-get-nuclear-weapons/
Interesting how JFK insisted that Israel “absolutely” not have nuclear weapons and demanded inspections of their Dimona nuclear facilities just 50 years ago. The bitter feud between he and Israel’s David Ben-Gurion resulted in the resignation of Ben-Gurion, and the green light for the assassination of JFK. Why was Jack Ruby (actually Jacob Rubenstein, a dual Israeli citizen) allowed unfettered access to the Dallas Police station while Oswald was in custody? What was the future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin doing in Dallas on November 22nd 1963, even though it is never mentioned in his memoirs? You will never see these smoking gun questions addressed in an Oliver Stone movie, or Parkland, or any of the disinformation our MSM spews

Kennedy Saved Us From A Nuclear War And Would Have Saved Us From Vietnam

This is a sad morning for me. We lost John F. Kennedy 50 years ago today. We lost his humanity, intelligence, compassion, and decency (Please forgive him for his character faults.)

I am always haunted by the Cuban missile crisis. It could have easily escalated into World War III with 120 million Soviet dead and up to 40 million American deaths. The whole world might have gone into a nuclear winter. When we emerged from this disaster only a small part of the human race would have survived. We would have been back in the time of the Dark Ages over 1000 years ago.

Khruschev put the missiles and 45,000 Soviet troops in Cuba because he thought that Kennedy was a weak man who could be intimidated. (Ironically had Nixon been president, Khruschev would not have put missiles in Cuba. He feared Nixon and was sure that he was a mad man.)

Kennedy was tempted to order air strikes on the missile sites and to go for an invasion with an estimated 18,000 US casualties. Khruschev might have let him get by with the air attack on the missiles. But if an invasion started he would have used tactical nuclear weapons on the island to sink US aircraft carriers and destroy the naval base at Guantanimo Bay. This could have easily escalated to a full nuclear war.

Kennedy did not know about the tactical nuclear weapons on the island. His instincts told him that any aggressive actions using military force would lead to a war. He stayed cool and calm. He started a dialogue with Khruschev. He came up with a face-saving solution.

Let us now turn to Vietnam and what might have been had Kennedy lived. Believe it or not, almost every year a very serious academic conference is held each year in Georgia. Academics and public officials pour over thousands of pages of documents, recordings and testimony to answer one question:”Would Kennedy have committed US troops and done things as Lyndon Johnson did? The consensus from all of these meetings is that he would not have.

Kennedy have traveled to Vietnam in the early 1950’s. He saw the situation there as a struggle for independence and national determination of the part of the Vietnamese people. He listened to Charles De Gaulle who warned him that a land war in Vietnam would be an awful mistake. (France lost some 250,000 men in Vietnam.) Kennedy would have continued material aid and withdrawn all US forces there. In 1965 he would have seen Vietnam as a lost cause and let nature take its course. We would have not had the nightmare with over 58,000 Americans killed, 366,000 wounded and some 3.4 million Vietnamese killed. Our country would not have been torn apart and pushed almost to the point of a civil war.

Yes one man can make a difference!!!

50 Years Ago This Morning….

I was 15 years old. I was in the 9th grade at Cullen Junior High School in Houston, Texas. At one in the afternoon I had just returned from lunch. I was in the algebra class of Raul Munoz. He came up to me and told me that President Kennedy was dead. I sort of laughed and told him that he must have been kidding. He got very sober and pale. He assured me that he would not kid about such things. Right then I knew that the president was dead. We all went into shock. No class work was done. We were all glued to televisions watching the sad drama unfold. That weekend I doubt if anyone went out to eat or to a movie.

Our Dog Copernicus Walks Past His Dream Fermale

Many parents make an effort to pick a wife or a husband for their child. Believe it or not dog owners do the same. For many years were were looking for a domestic partner or wife for our male dog Copernicus. We decided that only a beautiful German Shepherd female would do. For years Copernicus was promised this partner in life. For one reason or another we never went out and got such a dog for the household. Now Copernicus has a wife who he honestly met without our intervention. Her name is Alice and she weighs only 17.1 lbs vs the 60 lbs or so that Copernicus weighs. Yesterday we were walking on the beach. I saw a beautiful German shepherd female. I thought about what might have been. Copernicus seemed to hardly notice the beautiful lady.

The FT of London Talks About G4S-A Giant Security Company No One Has Heard Of

November 14, 2013 11:00 pm
G4S: the inside story
By Andrew Hill and Gill Plimmer
Damaging scandals are raising questions on how the third-largest listed private sector employer runs its empire
G4S Police Support Services staff member Marcus Bloomfield posing for a portrait outside the street to suite van in Boston, Lincolnshire UK on Oct 31 2013©James Dodd
G4S’s Marcus Bloomfield in front of a ‘Street to Suite’ custody van in Boston, Lincolnshire
On an overcast Friday evening on a rundown suburban street in Boston, Lincolnshire, a part-time plumber and a retired policeman are sitting in a large white van outside a cell-block, waiting to hear from the police. In black bulletproof vests, smart black trousers and white shirts, they look like police officers. But their van is emblazoned with the words “G4S – working with local policing” and the epaulettes on their uniforms carry the red, white and black logo of the private security company above that of Lincolnshire Police.
This is the frontline of part-privatised policing, where police officers still make the arrests but G4S staff go to the scene, drive offenders away, and later process them for fingerprints and other paperwork in the company’s own “custody suites”. “We tell offenders we are just a taxi service,” says Julian Davis, the ex-policeman on duty for G4S. “It helps defuse the tension.”
To critics, the police authority’s 10-year contract with G4S looks more like a time bomb that could destroy an increasingly fragile consensus about where the limits of private security lie. For G4S, however, such potentially explosive deals with the public sector – in Britain and abroad – are a treasure-chest, which it wants to prise open further.
The rise of G4S
The rise of G4S
Too cool, daddy
How did space become junk’s final frontier?
The Inventory – Bryan Adams
Graham Barwick
That contradiction underlines the challenges facing an organisation of a scale and scope rarely seen in the private sector since the 18th century, when the East India Company ran its own army, ruled large parts of the British empire and implemented some of the most controversial government policies of the age. From “The Manor”, its modern black-and-white headquarters in Crawley in West Sussex, G4S employs 620,500 staff in 115 countries, pursuing a vision that was laid out by its ambitious, marathon-running former chief executive Nick Buckles during a decade of aggressive expansion. That vision is summed up in the company’s slogan “Securing Your World”.
The bulk of its business involves supplying private guards for commercial and residential property, stewards for large events – from The Rolling Stones’ appearance this year in Hyde Park to the Indian Premier League cricket tournament – and armoured vans to carry cash from stores to banks and from banks to cash machines. But G4S armed guards also protect ships against piracy off Somalia, while its uniformed employees screen airline passengers in Vancouver, Canada, manage detention centres where immigrants are held before ­deportation, clean hospitals, and install and monitor security systems.
A branded epaulette is the only obvious difference between G4S support services employee Laura Greenley (right) and Sergeant Wills at Boston Police Station©James Dodd/Statement Images
A branded epaulette is the only obvious difference between G4S support services employee Laura Greenley (right) and Sergeant Wills at Boston Police Station
Excluding state-controlled groups, G4S is the third largest listed private-sector employer in the world, behind only Walmart, with 2.2 million staff, and Hon Hai (which trades as Foxconn, the Taiwanese manufacturer of devices such as Apple iPads), with 1.3 million. The only employer to rival G4S for ­ubiquity is McDonald’s: 1.8 million people work there but most are employed in its fast-food franchises. It is an apt parallel. Academics have pointed to the growth of G4S and large rivals as evidence of the “McDonaldisation” of private security – a reference to sociologist George Ritzer’s theory that many products and services are now supplied, like burgers in buns, by multinationals that put a premium on efficiency, standardisation, predictability and control.
But G4S’s control over its empire has slipped. Buckles stepped down in May, hit by the triple blows of a failed takeover of ISS, a Danish outsourcing group, an embarrassing failure to supply enough security guards for last year’s Olympics and a profit warning. The pressure on his successor – the more technocratic Ashley Almanza – remains intense. The government has prompted a criminal investigation by the Serious Fraud Office into alleged overcharging by G4S and rival Serco for electronic tagging of prisoners, some of whom had left the country, returned to prison or even died.
In July, an inquest jury recorded a verdict of unlawful killing for an Angolan, Jimmy Mubenga, who died after being restrained by three G4S security guards as he was being deported. A report into Oakwood prison, Staffordshire, run by G4S since 2012, revealed a serious drugs problem and shortages of clean clothing and basic toiletries (G4S blamed “teething problems”). Abroad, former G4S prison guards have claimed they oversaw forced ­injections and electric shocks at a South African maximum-security jail once lauded as a model.
Such high-profile, high-risk, high-margin contracts are still a vital part of G4S strategy. Work that puts staff in the line of fire is lucrative, and where Britain has led – fuelling the group’s growth over more than 20 years through privatisation of vital services in a sector the National Audit Office estimates is worth £93.5bn a year – G4S expects other countries to follow. “The true benefits of ­globalisation and being larger [are] that you can bring expertise to markets that aren’t familiar with the products and services you’ve developed in the UK,” Buckles says. According to Almanza, fighting to convince investors he can sustain G4S’s growth, its emerging markets business should continue to expand more strongly than its activities in the rest of the world.
G4S’s Clare Heyes checking CCTV feeds from cells at Boston Police Station©James Dodd/Statement Images
G4S’s Clare Heyes checking CCTV feeds from cells at Boston Police Station
But G4S’s ability to standardise and control such work only goes so far. As current and former executives concede, some of what G4S and its large rivals do will always give rise to highly public, sometimes violent, confrontation. Strict controls on cost may push already low wages down, increasing pressure on staff. Governments could also lose their appetite for privatisation and outsourcing. If managed too loosely, the group’s riskier activities could threaten the reputation and future of G4S as a whole, as its global presence could backfire. After years of expansion is G4S now simply too big, too complex and too risky to manage?
. . .
The trail to the modern world of private security starts with a Danish company called Kjøbenhavn Frederiksberg Nattevagt – the Copenhagen-Frederiksberg Night Watch – set up by drapery wholesaler Marius Hogrefe in 1901 with 20 guards. Three large companies, which together now employ nearly 1.5 million people, trace their histories back to this point. One is ISS – the Danish service company that G4S failed to buy two years ago. The others are the two global rivals in guarding, Securitas of Sweden and G4S itself.
Buckles was the architect of G4S. He started at Securicor ­(eventually the “S” in G4S) in 1985 as a project accountant but as early as the 1990s, he saw that size would be an asset in the business. His approach and appearance were not that of the typical leader of a blue-chip business. According to the head of one G4S subsidiary based outside the UK, when he first glimpsed Buckles at a regional management meeting about three years ago, the chief executive was wearing light-coloured trousers and loafers; with his long hair and open-neck shirt, he “looked more like Elvis than a CEO”. In person he was – and remains – engaging. Another G4S executive, based in Asia, says Buckles “had this ability to know you – he would always make sure that he spent time with all of his senior managers at any opportunity he could get”.
As chief executive of Securicor, Buckles helped broker a 2004 deal with Group 4 Falck, a direct Danish descendant of Hogrefe’s Copenhagen Night Watch. The Danish group was larger than the British company but within a year, Buckles, then aged 44, had become head of what was now Group 4 Securicor. Kean Marden, a London-based equity analyst with Jefferies, the investment bank, says: “Nick Buckles was good at planting flags on the map.” That is an understatement. Backed by a highly loyal and close-knit group of executives, Buckles aggressively pushed for rapid expansion. In the nine years to 2013, the group spent about £1.5bn and gobbled up more than 70 companies. The deal drive took G4S into new territory and brought an extra­ordinary array of sensitive security businesses, big and small, into the empire, including ArmorGroup, whose armed staff protect UK diplomats in Afghanistan and clear mines in Iraq, and Nuclear Security Services, which supplies security systems to nuclear, oil and chemical plants. Until Almanza said he would rein in the deals, the group kept £200m in an annual takeover war chest.
Nick Buckles 2013©Kalpesh Lathigra
Nick Buckles, former CEO: ‘There’s no difference in our service delivery today than 10 years ago – it’s probably better – it’s just that people are after us’
The Buckles strategy more than doubled G4S’s share price between 2004 and 2011 and made it a stock market favourite. His expansionist approach, however, did not go down well everywhere. “We have always heard that the goal is to be the largest private-sector employer in the world,” says the head of the G4S subsidiary. “What kind of metric is that? It’s size not quality. If you look at the environment they are operating in, in second-, third-tier countries, risks are very high; the opportunities for unethical ­behaviour are extremely high and, quite frankly, I think the business acumen of a lot of these folks is in question.”
In one area, though, the acumen of G4S managers is not in doubt. They are extremely adept contract bidders and negotiators. They honed this skill during years competing for public-sector business, after Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government introduced competitive tendering and private construction and management of hospitals, transport links and prisons in the 1980s. The policy helped drive smaller companies from the field – or into the arms of bigger outsourcing companies, which were better equipped to take on the potential liabilities. “The government really was the market maker in this industry,” says Dame DeAnne Julius, who wrote a report on outsourcing for the last British government in 2008 and used to be a director of fellow outsourcer Serco.
Ronald van Steden of VU University Amsterdam, an adviser to the Dutch government and co-author of a paper on how security companies have expanded and adapted, chameleon-like, to local jurisdictions, says: “Because there’s no debate and nobody really cares about it, [the security companies] follow a salami technique: slicing off a small part of public ­services to see how far they can go.” There is a further consequence: policy makers “are not always fully aware of the magnitude of the sector”.

More video
By the time Labour took power under Tony Blair in 1997, the idea of privatised public services was firmly embedded, despite early mistakes such as the episode in 1993 when a number of prisoners escaped from Group 4’s custody within weeks of the start of its contract to escort inmates. “Nobody was very impressed with G4S,” admits a former adviser to the UK government in the 2000s, “but nobody was very impressed with the UK Border officers or the Prison and Probation Service either. [G4S] only had to seem to be outperforming [them] rather than being a Rolls-Royce.”
This week, the National Audit Office warned about lack of transparency in government contracts with companies such as G4S and Serco and said the rise of a few major contractors needed to be scrutinised. But G4S and its rivals are not entirely to blame for the way the market has evolved, though they have profited from it. The government failed to co-ordinate or share information about early contracts, and the UK Treasury under Gordon Brown – the natural regulator of such activity – pushed to outsource more. Tom Gash, who was a senior crime policy adviser in Blair’s strategy unit and is now director of research at the Institute for Government, a think-tank, says: “There’s a pernicious public sector contracting dynamic: what you have had historically is often highly politicised drives towards outsourcing, with a heavy focus on doing the deal quickly and delivering success, not [on] how do we set up the market so it delivers in the long term.”
Armed forces step in to secure the 2012 London Olympics©Getty
Armed forces step in to secure the 2012 London Olympics
By December 2010, when the ill-fated Olympic security contract was signed, G4S was one of the few companies that could possibly have handled it. Then, in 2011, having secured the Olympics job, Buckles’ ambition hit a wall. He mounted a £5.2bn offer for ISS, G4S’s long-lost Danish cousin. The deal would have doubled the group’s size and moved it firmly into cleaning and facilities management. But previously loyal investors forced him to withdraw the bid. Just eight months later, Buckles faced further embarrassment when a shortfall in trained security staff for the London Olympics obliged the UK to mobilise armed forces personnel to assist. In front of a parliamentary committee that was hostile even by the Roman circus standards of such hearings, Buckles – who admits now he went into the committee room exhausted and unprepared – agreed with members of parliament that the prestigious contract had turned into “a humiliating shambles”. Two senior executives resigned and, following a profit warning in May this year, Buckles himself finally stepped down with a £16m package, including deferred pay, his pension and G4S shares.
Almanza – who was brought into the group as chief financial officer and promoted within a month – looks like the anti-Buckles. Where Buckles’ public persona is marked by blokeish bonhomie and grand ambition, Almanza’s style is buttoned-up and austere, with occasional flashes of dry humour. Buckles is a football fan; Almanza is a keen follower of rugby union. In his pomp, Buckles was known for his collar-length hair; Almanza is bald. Yet, as the new chief executive is starting to discover, many of the challenges he faces are the same as those that ultimately did for his predecessor.
. . .
Buckles’ most significant legacy is G4S’s global brand, imposed in 2005, when the group was already present in more than 100 countries, with 410,000 staff. He says the rationale was that it would help to raise standards and wages in the sectors that G4S served. Local companies “aren’t going to do [the job] as efficiently, with as much control and process as we do, because our reputation is at risk. So going into developing markets and establishing much stronger methods of security than they would otherwise get is a massive positive.” After that point, if managers came to him with the idea of exploring risky new areas, saying, “Don’t worry, we won’t brand it G4S,” Buckles says he would respond, “In that case, don’t do it.”
Buckles apologising to MPs for the 2012 Olympics ‘shambles’ when the company failed to supply enough security staff©PA
Buckles apologising to MPs for the 2012 Olympics ‘shambles’ when the company failed to supply enough security staff
The brand values include “the G4S Way” – common standards and practices including “service excellence” and ethics, reputation and crisis management. The GMB union, which represents 25,000 of the 45,000 G4S workers in the UK, compares the group favourably with other employers in the still-fragmented security sector. In India, for example, where all new recruits are paid more than the ­minimum wage, G4S guards get two weeks of classroom training at one of 31 schools around the country and two weeks’ training onsite and the chance to rise through the ranks to branch manager and beyond. “If you have ability, there’s possibility,” says the Asia-based G4S executive, pointing to G4S’s role in raising standards.
Although the G4S logo is omnipresent, the boots-on-the-ground nature of most of G4S’s business means most specific problems are handled locally – and usually don’t reverberate beyond the local market. Responsibility to “do the right thing lies quite heavily on our managers”, says the same ­executive, “down to the branch manager [who is] like a mini-managing director with profit and loss responsibilities”.
But for some G4S businesses, the brand is a handicap. One former ­executive, who used to sell expensive consulting services, says the logo was “troublesome” when trying to win business because “it stands for men in ill-fitting uniforms standing outside ­shopping centres or offices – in some parts of Africa, wearing flip-flops”.
Anthony Minnaar, who heads the security ­management programme at the University of South Africa (Unisa) and studies the global market for ­security services, says that while rival companies put their guards through Unisa’s professional development courses, few of G4S’s employees take part. “For them to just claim that they are assisting with the professionalisation of the guarding sector is nonsense,” he insists. G4S says that it is governed by the Private Security Regulations Authority and that all training is accredited before a guard gets a licence.
The most sensitive part of G4S’s South African business, however, is not guarding but prison management. Last month, South Africa’s Department of Correctional Services decided G4S had “lost effective control” of the Mangaung prison, accusing the company of using “uncertified security staff to perform custodial duties”. An investigation by the Wits Justice Project at the University of Witwatersrand, which interviewed former G4S guards, alleged they used electric shocks and forced injections to impose control. Andy Baker, G4S Africa’s regional president, strongly denies the allegations and says he expects “full management control [to] return to G4S once the current instability has abated”.
The company is under fire for alleged excesses by guards at Mangaung prison in South Africa©Wits Justice Project
The company is under fire for alleged excesses by guards at Mangaung prison in South Africa
One former South Africa-based executive blames a change in the way the prison was overseen after G4S took on the jail in 2008 through an acquisition. After years in which control of the budget and local management had been handled by UK-based experts in correctional services, G4S switched to a system of devolved oversight by Africa regional heads, who have responsibility for all G4S activities on the continent. The change was “quite uncomfortable”, says this former executive, as budget considerations for differing activities clashed. “If I’m guarding a casino, I’ll have particular costs, which are tangible,” says the former executive. “If I’m running a prison, I’ll spend money on rehabilitation and other things that are less tangible.”
Campaigners have jumped on the Mangaung crisis as further evidence of a company failing to live up to its own promise to raise standards. “G4S is interested in cosmetic changes at the top level, but we haven’t seen any changes at the level [where] workers are being managed,” says Rafeef Ziadah, a senior campaigns officer at War on Want, which is pushing for stronger global ­oversight of security companies under the aegis of the United Nations.
Highly publicised failures, as well as the threat of greater regulation, could also erode G4S’s business and undermine the lucrative public outsourcing market, which is already stalling in some areas. A recent critical report by the US-based Sentencing Project could find only 11 countries, including the UK, US and South Africa, with any form of prison privatisation. David Hall, former director of the University of Greenwich’s Public Services International Research Unit, says privatisation and outsourcing are no longer “badges of international respectability” for governments. “In developing countries, as in Europe, in terms of general political trends . . . the momentum is no longer with the private side,” he says. “It is at best stalled, at worst . . . going backwards.” Even in the UK, sensitive outsourcing plans for areas such as defence procurement (where G4S is not involved) and probation services (where it is) are now under even more intense political and public scrutiny.
That G4S is now a whipping boy is galling for Buckles, who refers to the company as if he still works there and clearly remains proud of the group. “There’s no difference in our service delivery today than 10 years ago – it’s probably better – it’s just that people are after us,” he says.
His replacement sees the situation slightly differently. Asked about Buckles’ supposedly “hands-on” style, Almanza is careful not to criticise his predecessor directly but says: “I don’t think management has been hands-on at a corporate level [and] although I think there was a distributed operating model, at the centre in the executive team, decision-making was very concentrated.”
G4S’s size should not be a management challenge. “They aren’t managing 620,000 people, they’re managing 6,200 contracts and they can do that perfectly simply,” comments Hall. Almanza says he asked himself, “Is G4S too big to manage?” when he joined the group. But he points out that most of the high-profile problems faced by G4S in the past two years should have been overseen close to home, including the abortive ISS merger, the Olympics contract and the UK electronic tagging deal, where G4S and Serco are alleged to have overcharged the government by tens of millions of pounds.
Even so, by granting a large amount of autonomy to individual managers on the most sensitive contracts, G4S ran a risk that corners would be cut. The former G4S risk consultant recalls his unit “scrambling to get a yes or no [from headquarters] only 24 hours before tendering” for potentially risky contracts. Hall, citing the Serious Fraud Office’s tagging probe, says companies such as G4S should “expect a recurrence of these kinds of issues because . . . [they have] people operating a contract within a clear financial framework, set by the parent company [and they] have work that is highly sensitive and political”.
Ashley Almanza, November 2011©Mike Abrahams
Ashley Almanza , G4S CEO: ‘It’s the nature of the business that we can hit the ball out of the park for 364 days of the year and on the last day of the year something goes wrong’
Almanza knows he must stop cracks in the brand from spreading. He says he has tightened assessment of the most complex and risky contracts. G4S now flies in executives with specific expertise to vet big, difficult deals. Almanza himself is demanding more information about who will take charge of such operations on the ground. In one recent case, he asked to see the organisational chart to assess the competence of the local management team.
He has strong financial reasons for clinging on to such work. What G4S calls “care and justice” – which covers both police and prison work – accounts for less than 10 per cent of group revenue but new contracts earn margins of more than 15 per cent, higher than for more mundane guarding. In return, G4S accepts that “stuff happens” – which is exactly what enrages campaigners and increasingly disquiets politicians.
At an investor meeting earlier this month, an analyst asked Almanza an unusually direct question for these normally anodyne sessions: is G4S at the stage where it is not worth putting shareholders’ money into some high-profile frontline contracts? The chief executive’s reply was equally direct: “We don’t think that’s the case.” He added: “We do difficult things sometimes in difficult places . . . It’s the nature of the business that we can . . . hit the ball out of the park for 364 days of the year and on the last day of the year something goes wrong.”
His response hints at an uncomfortable truth. When uniformed staff – however tightly supervised – are placating violent prisoners, tackling pirates or even fingerprinting drunks, the situation will occasionally get out of hand. Sometimes people will be hurt or could even die.
. . .
The G4S ‘police’. G4S support staff Beth Pearce (taking calls) and David Blunkett (staffing reception) at Boston Police Station, Lincolnshire©James Dodd/Statement Images
The G4S ‘police’. G4S support staff Beth Pearce (taking calls) and David Blunkett (staffing reception) at Boston Police Station, Lincolnshire
Near the bottom of the organisational diagram, the challenges for G4S have a human face. In Lincolnshire, many of the men and women who now embody the company were transferred from the police force as part of the deal. Even if cells are now called “custody suites”, the uniformed staff behind the desk in Boston, waiting for the Friday night influx of offenders, are the same people as before. They joined the police because they wanted to contribute to society.
Lincolnshire Police says the G4S collaboration has improved emergency call response rates, saved time – freeing police to get back on the beat – and cut costs. But the year preparing for the transfer to G4S was, as Clare Heyes, a custody suite worker and the union representative, puts it, “one of the most stressful I’d lived through . . . People were concerned that our jobs would be replaced by people who were cheaper. The feeling was that G4S would get us in the long run.” In fact, on the day, all that changed were her epaulettes. But she may yet be right about the long-term trend.
Laura Greenley, a senior custody detention officer, is keen to point out improvements since G4S came in: better communication, a new staff kitchen area, modernised cells. But she admits that with just two people on duty, and the cells usually full on a Friday night, the job is stressful. There is a rubber strip on the walls, which, if pushed in an emergency, will contact the nearest police station. But that assumes officers are there to heed the alarm. Often, they are out on a call.
With G4S in control, many new staff will be paid less than existing workers for doing the same job. Current G4S staff earn about £26,000 a year. Replacement jobs are being advertised at a rate that is £7,000 lower, in line with more menial and less stressful supermarket jobs. Greenley says she takes great pride in managing her block of 18 cells. But even she would not reapply on those terms. “I wouldn’t do this job for £19,000,” she says. “I could stack shelves in Tesco for that.”
Andrew Hill is an FT associate editor and management editor. Gill Plimmer is an FT correspondent. To comment, email magazineletters@ft.com
United Kingdom
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2013. You may share using our article tools.
Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
You may be interested ininfo
Japan in dramatic emissions u-turn
Post your own comment
Elena Torello Update your profile

SubmitBy submitting this comment I confirm that I have read and agreed to the FT terms and conditions. Please also see our commenting guidelines.
Subscribe to comments Comments
No comments yet

Illustration by Luis Grañena of various professions©Luis Grañena The great middle-class identity crisis
burnt-down printing press in Colombo©Reuters Censorship and violence threaten Sri Lanka’s press
Life & Arts: Sotheby’s $105m sale sets Warhol record
Magazine: The great middle-class identity crisis
Magazine: An exclusive interview with Bill Gates
Theatre & Dance: Jeeves & Wooster in Perfect Nonsense, Duke Of York’s Theatre, London – review
Magazine: An exclusive interview with the Dalai Lama

More FT Twitter accounts
AnalysisGrasp the implications of global events
City ViewNew Executive level job board

Click here

MOST RECENT FROM LIFE & ARTS Stopped press Ian Bostridge Commander-in-chief They think it’s all overcoat How Flores began to bloom
Senior Manager – Digital Operations
The Thomas Cook Group
Director of Commercial Business
Incommunities Group
Director (Grade AD14)
Translation Centre
Connect Plus
Register for free to receive the latest executive jobs by email
Interactive graphics
Audio slideshows
Picture slideshows
FT Lexicon
FT clippings
Currency converter
MBA rankings
Today’s newspaper
FT press cuttings
FT ebooks
FT ePaper
Economic calendar
Alerts Hub
Daily briefings
FT on Facebook
FT on Twitter
FT on your mobile
Share prices on your phone
RSS feeds
Quick links
FT Live
How to spend it
Social Media hub
The Banker
The Banker Database
fDi Intelligence
fDi Markets
Professional Wealth Management
This is Africa
Investors Chronicle
Pensions Week
Corporate subscriptions
Education subscriptions
FT Fine Wine Plan
Annual reports
Executive job search
Non-Executive Directors’ Club
Businesses for sale
Contracts & tenders
Analyst research
Company announcements
Help •Contact us •About us •Advertise with the FT •Terms & conditions •Privacy policy •Copyright •Cookie policy
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2013 FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.

We Lost Our Dear Dog Cassi Almost One Year Ago

We Lost Our Dog Cassi One Year Ago Just now
Jack Waldbewohner from Sharp Park
Elena and I have lived in Pacifica for almost 10 years. For the first nine years of our life here, we loved to walk our dogs near the Lands End apartments and the large trash processing center. There are beautiful ocean views, people paragliding, etc. For nine years we ha no problems with letting our dogs run off leash in the area. On Saturday afternoon,November 24, 2012, my wife Elena took our dogs Copernicus and his daughter Cassi on a walk in the area. As we had done for 9 years , Elena let the animals run off leash. All went well for most of the walk. As Elena was in the area near the parking lot, Cassi went running off. She ran right into a pack of 4 coyotes. Her neck was broken and she was eaten. Our large male dog Copernicus went over to help his doomed daughter. He was driven back by two of the coyotes who came over and menaced my wife Elena. We were devastated by the loss of Cassi. We called many agencies and got no help. Finally we contacted Vice Mayor David J. Canepa of Daly City. He was very sympathetic and concerned. He got an investigation started by the Daly City Police. We hoped that this investigation would have led to the coyotes being relocated. That has not happened. It appears that we have several very aggressive packs of coyotes operating in this area.. I heard one report of a coyote the size of a German shepherd sighted near the Pacifica pier one morning. There have been quite a number cases of animals disappearing in the last year or so. I suspect that many of these animals were lost to coyotes. Animals owners are not the only ones who need to be concerned about this. Parents with small children need to be very careful. There are numerous documented reports (mostly from Southern California) about small children attacked or even killed by coyotes.

Mike Shedlock Warns Of The Dangers That We All Face From Civil Forfeitures

Guilty Until Proven Innocent; Grabbing Hand of the Law

In criminal court, you are innocent until proven guilty.

It’s a different matter altogether in civil forfeiture, where prosecutors can and do seize the assets of anyone on phony charges. Given there is no recourse or fine, the best the innocent victims can do is get their property back, most likely with a huge delay, if at all.

Consider the plight of Terry Dehko and his daughter Sandy Thomas. They run a small grocery store in Fraser, Michigan. Because their insurance only covers a cash limit of $10,000, they frequently make smaller deposits. One day last January, the government seized $35,000 of their assets, not in the store, but in the store account.

Officials said Dehkos had violated federal money-laundering rules, which forbid people to “structure” their bank deposits so as to avoid the $10,000 threshold that triggers banks to report a transaction to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

There was no evidence of guilt. Dehko was not charged with any crimes, and the IRS supported Dehko’s claim. Nonetheless, Dehko is offered 20% of the amount taken from him.

Grabbing Hand of the Law

The Economist explains the plight of Dehko in its report The Grabbing Hand of the Law
In criminal cases, the government can confiscate assets only after a conviction. Under “civil forfeiture”, however, it can grab first and ask questions later. Property can be seized merely on the suspicion that it has been involved in a crime. Citizens have no right to a swift hearing. For a small business, that can be fatal.

In many civil-forfeiture cases the agencies that seize the assets keep most of the proceeds, and can use them to pad their budgets or buy faster patrol cars. It is hard to know how common this is, but the Institute for Justice (a libertarian law firm that is representing the Dehkos) notes that the federal government shared $450m of seized assets with state and local authorities in 2012.

The grabbers do not always prevail. A motel owner in Massachusetts recently won back his motel after prosecutors tried to seize it because one guest in 13,000 had been arrested for drug offences. In October in California, prosecutors who were trying to seize a building because two of the tenants were marijuana dispensaries (which are legal under Californian law), gave up and let the landlord keep it.

But this is scant comfort for the Dehkos, who are struggling to hold on to the store they have run since 1978. “It’s kind of scary that they can do this to you,” says Ms Thomas. “In America, you’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.”
Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Goldmoney: The best way to buy gold and silver

Guilty Until Proven Innocent; Grabbing Hand of the Law

Posted by Michael Shedlock at 10:56 PM

Disclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

Older Post Home
Subscribe to:

Mike “Mish” Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Continue reading…

Goldmoney: The best way to buy gold and silver

Top Financial Blog Citations

New York Times: NYT 10th Annual Year in Ideas – #1 Idea of the Year ‘Do-It-Yourself Macroeconomics’

Time Magazine: Best 25 Financial Blogs

Bloomberg: Financial Blogs: The Best of the Bunch

CNBC: Best Alternative Financial Websites

Strategist News: Best Business Blogs 2011

Android app on Google Play

Mish Audio Video

2012-11-03: Capital Account
“Jobs, Real Wages, Income Distribution, Fiscal Stimulus”

2012-10-10: Capital Account
“IMF Downgrades, Unemployment, Participation Rate, Conspiracies; What is the Best Way to Measure Unemployment?”

2012-09-19: Capital Account
“QE to Infinity and Beyond”

2012-07-24: Capital Account
“Social Media Panic in Italy, Soaring Yields in Spain, and the Upcoming 20th Euro Summit, Bound to be Another Failure”

2012-07-11: Capital Account
“Time for Krugman to Leave Ivory Tower for Real World”

2012-04-15: Max Keiser
European Merry-Go-Round, Rising Yields in Spain, Obamacare, the US Dollar, Student Loans, Gold

2012-03-06: Capital Account
Greek Exit, Stock Valuations, War in Iran, Where to Put Your Money, Faber’s Formula for Safety

2012-01-28: Capital Account
Snow stories from Davos and “muddle-through” economics with Mish

2012-01-20: Capital Account
Discussion of Money Supply, Inflation, the Fed, SOPA; GOP Chairman Shelves Stop Online Piracy Act – A Triumph for Whom?

2011-12-20: Capital Account
Mish on Malfunctioning Bureaucrats, Gold’s Recent Decline and Chinese Chicken Feet

2011-12-29: Max Keiser
Mish 2012 Predictions; 2011 Year in Review with Max Keiser

2011-11-18: Max Keiser
Rise of Technocrats, Fraudulent Conveyance, MF Global, the Culture of Greed, Christina Romer, and the US Dollar

2011-05-11: Wall Street Shuffle on Jobs, Silver, Oil
CNN Radio KFXR 1190 AM, Dallas-Fort Worth

2011-04-23: Syndicated Interview on Canadian Radio – My Segment Starts 29:31
This Week in Money Interview

2011-03-29 – Sound Money Interview
“Sound Money Interview on 91.5fm WNYE New York

2011-02-11 – Deflation or Inflation?
“Interview with the Freedom News Hour

2011-01-06 – Bulls and Bears Themes for 2011
“Frisby’s Bulls and Bears 2011 Predictions from James Turk, Bob Hoye, Mish, Others

2010-03-12 – Mish with Marc Faber
“Inflation or Deflation?” Debate: Mish vs. Dr. Doom

2010-02-12 Max Keiser
Spotlight on China, Japan, Jobs, Pensions, Part 1

Spotlight on China, Japan, Jobs, Pensions, Part 2

2009-12-09 Tech Ticker
“Bank Lending, Jobs, The Great Retrace

2009-10-30 King World News
Mish and Eric King discuss Gold, the Stock Market, the US Dollar, Sideline Cash, China, and US real estate

2009-05-15: My Speech at Google
Thoughts on Blogging and the Economy – Speech at Google

Elliott Wave International
How to Identify Turning Points in Your Charts Using Fibonacci
(VIDEO) What Is the Debt Situation in Europe and the U.S.?
Deflationary Forces Stymie the Fed’s Economic Rescue Efforts
(VIDEO) Learn to Spot a Head & Shoulders Pattern in Your Charts
How to Find Trading Opportunities in ANY Market
A Big Reason Why 2013 Stock Prices are in the Stratosphere
Robert Prechter of Elliott Wave International gives you a clear sense of what really drives the markets and the U.S. economy. In this FREE report, you will read about real estate, crude oil, gold, and other markets (with the support of 16 charts!) to see why these markets point to deflation rather than inflation – exactly the opposite of what the Fed wants. But never mind what the Fed wants: What you want and what you will get is a new perspective on the financial markets to help you invest prudently. Download your FREE report by Robert Prechter now – for a limited time >>



Will the Fed “Taper” in December?
Schedule for Week of November 3rd
Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 662 Institutions
Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs: Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama
Lawler on Homebuilders: Home Orders Off Significantly Last Quarter

Leeches at the Government Trough
Yellenomics – or the Coming Tragedy of Errors
The Theory of Interest and Prices in Practice
A Tsunami of Debt
NSA Chief: We Didn’t Do Nothing! Honest Injun!

Weighing the Week Ahead: Time for a Year-End Rally?
Treasury Yields in Perspective
Weekend Update: Best Stock Market Indicator Says “Tradable”
Getting Technical: Weekend Update
S&P 500 Snapshot: Up 0.11% for the Week, Fractionally Off Its All-Time High

Robb Wolf: The Science Behind Healthy Diet & Fitness
John Rubino: Out of Good Options
The Fed Can Only Fail
Alasdair Macleod: Currency Crisis Dead Ahead
Growth is Obsolete

Hidden debt must still be repaid
Revisiting my 2011 predictions
Rebalancing and long term growth
The urbanization fallacy
The changing debate over China’s economy

Unaffordable Recreation and the Ratchet Effect
Instability Start on the Margins
What Real Estate Bubble? Oh, You Mean the One That’s Bigger Than the 2007 Bubble?

The US capital stock: old and busted, but why?
Look ma, no uniquely recalcitrant sovereign
Slow-motion regulatory explosion update
Abandon all hope, ye who venture here
Markets Live: Friday, 1st November, 2013

Advance Notice
Will the Soufflé rise twice? (3)
An outbreak of communication
Economics’ odd couple highlights a Nobel folly
How to spot a housing bubble before it bursts

Chen Lin Advises – Buy Fracking Stocks, Sell Gold
The Most Important Energy Map You’ll See This Year
It’s Time to Buy Refining Stocks
Lebanon’s Oil Future on Hold
Oil Market Forecast & Review 1st November 2013

1h : 25m : 00s

Copyright 2009 Mike Shedlock. All Rights Reserved.
StatCounter – Free Web Tracker and Counter View My Stats
Home About Contact Sitka Pacific

Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/11/guilty-until-proven-innocent-grabbing.html#r0a1fm6g2AdFru3i.99